Differences between revisions 5 and 7 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 5 as of 2009-08-17 09:35:28
Size: 705
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2009-11-09 16:21:21
Size: 1032
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
||[[DesyModGEMContRui|Contact Rui de Oliveira]] || || || || Not Started || || Estabilish the GEM segmentation || SC || || || Completed ||
|| Estabilishing the contact pattern || SC || 02/11/09 || 09/11/09 || Completed ||
||[[DesyModGEMContRui|Contact Rui de Oliveira]] || SC || 17/08/09 || || Started ||
Line 9: Line 11:



Line 17: Line 15:

=== Status Summary ===
Because we want to build a module with the maximum possible sensitive area we need to use custom GEM which can fit the size allotted in the endplate.

The To Do List for the design and production of the GEMs to be used in the readout module

Goal

Resp. Person

Beginning

End

Status

Estabilish the GEM segmentation

SC

Completed

Estabilishing the contact pattern

SC

02/11/09

09/11/09

Completed

Contact Rui de Oliveira

SC

17/08/09

Started

Design the GEM

SC

10/08/09

Started

Estabilish a glueing strategy

SC

10/08/09

Started

Evaluate the way to measure the GEM flatness

Not Started

Gathering financing for the buying of the flatness measuring system

Not Started

Legenda:

  • SC: Stefano Caiazza
  • KD: Klaus Dehmelt
  • RV: Robert Volkenborn

Status Summary

Because we want to build a module with the maximum possible sensitive area we need to use custom GEM which can fit the size allotted in the endplate.

DesyModGEM (last edited 2016-07-08 09:51:14 by GeorgVonBismarck)